🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.